For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a buddy - my extremely own "best-selling" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.
Yet it was totally written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.
It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also rather a lot, systemcheck-wiki.de and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It simulates my chatty style of writing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating data about me.
Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.
There's likewise a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.
There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, because pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language model.
I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can order any additional copies.
There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and joy".
Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.
He intends to widen his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.
It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.
Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.
"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we in fact suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.
"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."
In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.
"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative purposes must be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without permission must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective but let's develop it morally and relatively."
OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.
The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use developers' material on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.
Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".
He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.
"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.
"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The federal government is undermining among its finest performing industries on the unclear pledge of development."
A government representative said: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their material, access to premium material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."
Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public data from a broad variety of sources will also be made available to AI scientists.
In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.
But this has now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to face less regulation.
This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.
They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.
If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.
When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It is complete of mistakes and opentx.cz hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.
But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm unsure for how long I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.
Outside the UK? Sign up here.
1
How an AI written Book Shows why the Tech 'Frightens' Creatives
Alberta Hebert edited this page 2 weeks ago